← Home
⇄ ToolLions comparison engine

Kling AI vs Runway

Compare pricing, ratings, functions, limits, privacy, pros and cons side by side.

Tool B only shows tools that share a category with Tool A.
Ready to try one? Open the official website before you dive into the full table. Always check current pricing and limits.
8.6

Kling AI

Kuaishou Technology

(0)

Kling AI creates cinematic video from text, images and reference elements, with controllable motion, multi-shot sequencing and model-dependent native audio.

  • VIDEO 3.0 and 3.0 Omni
  • Text-to-video
  • Image-to-video
freemium_credit_subscriptionFree planAPIMobile app#New
8.6

Runway

Runway AI, Inc.

(0)

Runway focuses on AI video, generative clips, image-to-video and creative editing for creators and marketing teams.

  • Text-to-video
  • Image-to-video
  • Video effects
freemium_credit_subscriptionFree planAPIMobile app#New
🏆

Quick verdict

Kling AI fits AI Video Generators. Runway is relevant to compare because both tools share at least one category.

Score overview

Kling AI: 8.6/10 · Runway: 8.6/10

Kling AI vs Runway

Factor
RatingNo user ratingsNo user ratings
Score overview8.6/108.6/10
Ease of use8.4/108.6/10
Price/value8.8/107.8/10
Output quality9.2/108.6/10
Best for
  • audio
  • video
  • text
  • Professional creators
  • agencies and production teams that want generation
  • editing
  • animation
  • collaboration and deployment in one environment.
Core features
  • image generation
  • Windows
  • audio
  • VIDEO
  • video
  • Video
  • Text
  • API
  • Gen-4.5 text-to-video and image-to-video Edit Studio with Aleph 2.0 for generative video editing Act-Two performance-driven character animation Gen-4 image generation with References Selected third-party media models Generative audio and custom voices Reusable node-based Workflows Prebuilt Apps for production tasks Shared Projects and workspace credits 4K upscaling and watermark-free paid exports Runway MCP for AI assistants Separate public developer API iOS and Android apps Enterprise SSO
  • analytics and configurable teamspaces
Use cases
  • images
  • audio
  • video
  • API
  • Advertising and social-video concepts Storyboard and image-to-video shots Object
  • lighting and environment edits Character animation from a driving performance Product visuals and campaign variations Film and television previsualization Music visuals and short clips Reusable client-production workflows Visual localization and adaptation 4K output preparation API media prototypes Shared creative production
Platforms
  • Windows
  • Web
  • API
  • Web iOS Android
Inputs
  • images
  • audio
  • Text
  • Images
  • Audio
  • Video
  • video
  • Text
Outputs
  • images
  • audio
  • video
  • VIDEO
  • Images
  • Audio
  • Video
  • video
  • API
Integrations
  • Windows
  • API
  • Discord
  • API
API
Mobile app
Browser extension
Privacy7.0/108.0/10
Limitations
  • VIDEO
  • API
  • Credits can disappear quickly during iteration Standard and Pro subscription credits do not roll over Free credits are one-time and cannot be topped up Web-app and API credits are completely separate Premium models make exact output cost difficult to predict Self-serve terms allow training with inputs and outputs Best administration and no-training terms require Enterprise No confirmed native Zapier
  • Make or Slack integration Advanced workflows require model-specific learning External review scores vary sharply by source and scope
Pros
  • audio
  • video
  • API
  • Very broad video
  • image
  • editing
  • audio and automation stack Strong flagship video quality and motion control Generative editing works on existing footage Act-Two adds practical performance capture Workflows support repeatable production Useful collaboration and workspace controls Public API and MCP extend deployment Paid plans remove watermarks and add 4K upscaling Enterprise security controls are well documented Commercial usage rights are clearly described
Cons
  • Introductory pricing renews higher Credits can burn quickly Free plan has no monthly credit allocation API billing is separate Consumer training terms are permissive No confirmed SOC 2 No confirmed SSO Team pricing is not consistently public Promotions change quickly
  • Credits can disappear quickly during iteration Standard and Pro subscription credits do not roll over Free credits are one-time and cannot be topped up Web-app and API credits are completely separate Premium models make exact output cost difficult to predict Self-serve terms allow training with inputs and outputs Best administration and no-training terms require Enterprise No confirmed native Zapier
  • Make or Slack integration Advanced workflows require model-specific learning External review scores vary sharply by source and scope

External review scores

Scores from other platforms are shown separately because each source measures a different audience. ToolLions never averages them into one artificial score.

PlatformKling AIRunway
Trustpilot ↗1.2/5Company & service reviews · 277 reviews · Checked 18 Jul 2026
G2 ↗3.9/5Product reviews · 24 reviews · Checked 17 Jul 2026
Product Hunt ↗4.4/5Product reviews · 18 reviews · Checked 17 Jul 2026
Gartner Peer Insights ↗4.4/5Product reviews · 10 reviews · Checked 18 Jul 2026
Capterra (Runway Gen-2 listing) ↗4.5/5Product reviews · 2 reviews · Checked 17 Jul 2026
💶

Pricing comparison that uses the same basis

Free access, payment triggers, real limits and the most suitable plan—without mixing monthly and annual prices.

Comparable paid entryKling AI · $6.99 / month
Buying questionKling AIRunway
Free accessBasic creation access and up to 30 Elements, without a recurring monthly credit allocation.Limited evaluation account with selected models and a one-time balance. · 125 one-time credits · 5 GB
When payment is neededPay for commercial use, regular VIDEO 3.0 generation, 1080p output, watermark removal, upscaling, fast track and a larger Elements library. Pro is a more realistic professional baseline than Standard when retries are expected.Payment becomes necessary when the 125 one-time trial credits are used, or when you need recurring credits, all current models, watermark-free exports, 4K upscaling, more storage or team features.
Credits and limitsVIDEO 3.0 uses 6, 9 or 12 credits per generated second depending on mode. Voice control adds 2 credits per second. Other models and image operations have different rates. · Basic has no recurring monthly credits · Introductory prices renew higher625 credits · 625 credits/month · 100 GB
Likely best-value plan$32.56 / month · Regular professional creators and small studios · The practical professional tier with 3,000 monthly credits, 150 Elements and priority processing. The current introductory price is $25.99 and renewal is listed at $32.56.Standard · $15 monthly or $12/month with $144 annual prepayment · Best for Occasional creators producing short clips · This is the lowest recurring plan with all image and video models, watermark-free exports, 4K upscaling and 625 monthly credits.
Value verdictChoose Kling AI when video quality, motion realism, character reference, native audio and multi-shot control matter more than simple pricing. Basic is useful for testing but has no recurring monthly credit grant and no commercial licence. Standard is the lowest paid entry, but buyers should budget for the higher renewal price rather than only the introductory $6.99 offer. Pro is the practical professional tier because 3,000 credits and priority processing give more room for retries. Premier and Ultra target intensive creators. API users must budget separately because resource packages are not the same as a consumer subscription.Standard has the clearest entry value for occasional recurring work because it unlocks the full model range, removes watermarks and adds 4K upscaling. Pro is the more practical default for regular creators because 2,250 monthly credits reduce the chance that a few retries exhaust the allowance. Max has the lowest effective cost per included subscription credit, but only for genuinely high-volume users.

Free access

Kling AI

Basic creation access and up to 30 Elements, without a recurring monthly credit allocation.

Runway

Limited evaluation account with selected models and a one-time balance. · 125 one-time credits · 5 GB

When payment is needed

Kling AI

Pay for commercial use, regular VIDEO 3.0 generation, 1080p output, watermark removal, upscaling, fast track and a larger Elements library. Pro is a more realistic professional baseline than Standard when retries are expected.

Runway

Payment becomes necessary when the 125 one-time trial credits are used, or when you need recurring credits, all current models, watermark-free exports, 4K upscaling, more storage or team features.

Credits and limits

Kling AI

VIDEO 3.0 uses 6, 9 or 12 credits per generated second depending on mode. Voice control adds 2 credits per second. Other models and image operations have different rates. · Basic has no recurring monthly credits · Introductory prices renew higher

Runway

625 credits · 625 credits/month · 100 GB

Likely best-value plan

Kling AI

$32.56 / month · Regular professional creators and small studios · The practical professional tier with 3,000 monthly credits, 150 Elements and priority processing. The current introductory price is $25.99 and renewal is listed at $32.56.

Runway

Standard · $15 monthly or $12/month with $144 annual prepayment · Best for Occasional creators producing short clips · This is the lowest recurring plan with all image and video models, watermark-free exports, 4K upscaling and 625 monthly credits.

Value verdict

Kling AI

Choose Kling AI when video quality, motion realism, character reference, native audio and multi-shot control matter more than simple pricing. Basic is useful for testing but has no recurring monthly credit grant and no commercial licence. Standard is the lowest paid entry, but buyers should budget for the higher renewal price rather than only the introductory $6.99 offer. Pro is the practical professional tier because 3,000 credits and priority processing give more room for retries. Premier and Ultra target intensive creators. API users must budget separately because resource packages are not the same as a consumer subscription.

Runway

Standard has the clearest entry value for occasional recurring work because it unlocks the full model range, removes watermarks and adds 4K upscaling. Pro is the more practical default for regular creators because 2,250 monthly credits reduce the chance that a few retries exhaust the allowance. Max has the lowest effective cost per included subscription credit, but only for genuinely high-volume users.

🔎

Evidence behind this comparison

A concise selection of sourced findings; extra research stays on the individual tool pages.

Kling AI

Kling AI earns 8.6/10 for its strong video quality ceiling, VIDEO 3.0 Omni controls, native audio, multi-shot storytelling, Elements, mobile and desktop apps and public API. It loses points for promotional pricing complexity, potentially rapid credit burn, separate API billing, permissive consumer training terms and limited public enterprise-security evidence.

Free planConfidence: High

Basic is a genuine $0 account, but the current guide lists no recurring monthly credits and limits it to non-commercial use.

Kling AI membership pricing ↗
Promotional pricingConfidence: High

Standard, Pro, Premier and Ultra use first-subscription promotional prices followed by higher renewal prices.

Kling AI membership pricing ↗
VIDEO 3.0 credit costConfidence: High

VIDEO 3.0 currently consumes 6, 9 or 12 credits per generated second depending on mode; voice control adds 2 credits per second.

Kling VIDEO 3.0 guide ↗
Uncertainty

Prices, model availability, regional taxes and product limits can change. ToolLions did not perform a hands-on benchmark for this update.

Runway

Runway is one of the strongest all-round AI media production platforms. Gen-4.5, Aleph 2.0, Act-Two, third-party models, Agent, Apps, Workflows, MCP and the API create exceptional breadth, but real cost depends on credits and self-serve terms allow training on inputs and outputs.

Current plan lineupConfidence: High

The current public lineup is Free, Standard, Pro, Max and Enterprise. Max replaced Unlimited for new subscribers on 1 June 2026; remaining Unlimited accounts are scheduled to move on 1 September 2026.

Runway pricing and Max migration notice ↗
Free plan economicsConfidence: High

Free includes 125 one-time credits that do not expire. It has no recurring monthly allowance, Free users cannot buy additional credits and only a selected model set is available.

Runway pricing and credit documentation ↗
Credit consumption and rolloverConfidence: High

Gen-4.5 costs 12 credits per generated second. Standard therefore represents about 52 seconds per month, Pro about 187 seconds and Max about 791 seconds before retries. Standard and Pro credits reset, Max rolls over up to one month and purchased credits never expire.

Runway pricing and credits ↗
Uncertainty

Runway changes models, credit rates and product packaging quickly. The Unlimited-to-Max migration is still in progress for legacy subscribers, independent benchmark rankings are dynamic and exact Enterprise data terms depend on contract.

⚗️

Core-function practical comparison

We compare shared core functions with matching test slugs. Tool-specific functions are shown separately instead of forcing unrelated products through identical tasks.

Kling AI
RunwayTested on: 2026-07-19Plan / model: Runway account; the exact subscription plan was not recorded. Nano Banana Pro was selected and the approval panel showed a cost of 20 credits.

Additional tool-specific function tests

Runway

Create a reference image from text8.8 Very good, with minor prompt-adherence errors

Why tested: A strong reference frame gives later Runway image-to-video tests clear identity, object and background markers. This task measures whether Runway can create that production-ready starting image from a detailed prompt.

Test setup: A new image generation was started in the Runway desktop web application. No image or style reference was uploaded. The prompt was entered as text, the aspect ratio was set to 16:9, Nano Banana Pro was selected, Quality optimization was active and the 20-credit job was manually approved. The first generated image was downloaded and evaluated without regeneration, inpainting, cropping or retouching.

Input used: Text-only input. The prompt requested a woman in a red coat beside a yellow vintage car on a European street, with a blue bicycle, three terracotta plant pots and a café with green window frames as consistency markers. The downloaded output measured 2048 × 1143 pixels.

Prompt / instruction: Create a photorealistic cinematic image of a woman around 30 years old standing beside a yellow vintage car on a quiet European street. She has shoulder-length dark brown hair, a clearly visible face and is wearing a long red coat, black trousers and white sneakers. Her full body and both hands must be visible. One hand rests naturally on the car door. The street contains a blue bicycle leaning against a brick wall, three small plants in identical terracotta pots and a café with green window frames in the background. Use soft overcast daylight, realistic proportions, natural skin texture and sharp details. Camera: eye-level medium-wide shot, 35mm lens, subject centered slightly to the left. No motion blur, no text, no logos, no extra people, no distorted hands, no cropped limbs.

Evaluation criteria: Prompt adherence; facial and hand anatomy; full-body visibility; correct clothing and object placement; one bicycle and three plant pots; realistic materials and lighting; composition; absence of extra people; absence of cropped limbs; and compliance with the no-text and no-logo instruction.

Result: The first-pass Runway image is highly usable as a reference frame. The woman, red coat, black trousers, white sneakers, yellow vintage car, green café windows, blue bicycle and three plant pots are all present. Her full body and both hands are visible, and the hands, face, car geometry, lighting and street perspective look convincing. The medium-wide eye-level composition also follows the request well. The main failures are strict rather than structural: a Mercedes emblem is clearly visible despite the no-logo instruction, and the café boards and bicycle contain small unreadable or brand-like lettering despite the no-text instruction. The hand rests on the mirror and door area rather than clearly on the door itself, and the three pots are similar but not perfectly identical. Overall, the image is a strong first result, but it would need a small cleanup pass before publication under the original no-text and no-logo requirements.

Create a reference image from text
Unedited first Runway generation. Strong photorealism, clean anatomy and good composition. The requested subject, car, café, bicycle and three pots are present. Visible car branding and small pseudo-text on background elements are the main prompt violations.

Sources and notes: ToolLions editorial Runway test evidence from 2026-07-19: prompt and interface screenshot, Quality-setting screenshot, approval panel and original downloaded output. Add the relevant official Runway documentation URL before publication.

Mats in ’t Veld
Reviewed by

Mats in ’t Veld

Founder & AI tool reviewer Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Mats uses, tests and compares AI tools for ToolLions from Amsterdam.

About Mats and ToolLions

More relevant comparisons